Seven – Seven Cycles

Seven In The News: The N-1 Substack by James Huang

James, a long-time industry veteran, just posted some good words about Seven’s Rider-Ready updates. His take on the program is interesting and worth a read.

“what’s more shocking about its program is its massive scope. Its new Rider-Ready range comprise 16 models, up to 36 sizes (per model, not total), three different titanium tubesets, three different stiffness levels, as much or as little tire clearance as you could want, and a ton of finish and build kit options – all from a “stock” build.”

Rob Vandermark, Seven’s founder, said this about the project’s development: “A year ago, we launched a few Rider-Ready bike models to see if it would be something riders wanted. They did. The project has been so successful that we’ve expanded it to include most bike categories while maintaining streamlined build times.”

Stay tuned for more words from James. Or, better yet, subscribe to N-1 if you haven’t already. James is probably the industry’s most thoughtful technical writer and product tester.

Rider-Ready Gravel 743, going on a long ride.

Rider-Ready Road 732, looking fast.

Rider-Ready Mountain 924-130, out on a fast and fun ride!

Evolving Gravel Bike Tire Sizes

Gravel bike tire sizes are getting wider, fast. We see a lot of interest in 50+ mm tires. Some riders say bigger tires are faster. Some say it’s bunk. It partly depends on the terrain you ride. The rougher the terrain, the faster a wider tire will typically roll. It also partly depends on the harshness of your ride; a wider tire will help mask the shortcomings of your frame and fork.

The chart below shows 10 of the most popular and respected gravel bikes compared with Seven’s Rider-Ready gravel bikes. Our three gravel designs (plus our allroads) cover every kind of performance offroad riding.

Seven’s Gravel 758 is designed for 2.3″ (58 mm) mountain bike tires. This machine is a proper mountain bike with drop bars. Ideal for rough trails and rocky terrain.

Seven’s Gravel 753 has room for 53 mm (2.1″) mountain ready tires. The 753 is our riders’ current most popular balance of capability and speed.

Seven’s Gravel 743 is our classic gravel bike. It’s what most people think of when they think gravel.

Seven’s Allroads 738 is as capable as some popular gravel bikes.

Seven’s Rider-Ready gravel bikes are not warmed over mountain bikes.

Control or Fatigue?

Interest in wider tires has a lot to do with harsh riding frames of carbon or aluminum compared to well-designed titanium.

Do you want wider to help smooth out the ride and take the edge off, or do you want wider to give you more control at higher speeds and in more demanding conditions? If it’s the former, a Seven titanium frame is a great answer; this will provide you all the shock absorption you could want without the need for a wider tire. If it’s the latter, Seven offers more wide tire options and sizes than any other bike brand.

Whatever gravel you want to ride, Seven’s got it covered.

+++

All data was taken from the respective bike company websites.

Chainstay Material: Off The Charts

Seven takes multiple design approaches to drivetrain engineering. Here are a few examples.

There is chainstay stiffness and drivetrain stiffness. Both are useful to understand and to consider separately.

Chainstays account for about 50% of a drivetrain’s stiffness. The rest of the stiffness comes from a combination of:

Dropouts & axle interface: Seven’s are machined titanium and the stiffest by about 3x compared to any others we’ve tested — titanium or carbon.
Disc brake mount: Seven’s is bolted to the dropout rather than being welded to a thin tube or a molded carbon shape.
Bottom bracket shell: Seven’s is machined from the thickest material available.
Down tube & seat tube: We use a number of tube sizes and walls to tailor drivetrain stiffness.

See Figure 1 for more details.

Next, we turn these parts into a frame. Riders choose either of our framebuilding methods:

Seven Simple-Custom^TM program, where we offer three tubesets that are both size-specific and usage-specific.
Seven’s full custom program, where we individually design the tubeset from the ground up.

Simple-Custom

We offer three levels of frame stiffness. See figure 1 for an example of the differences and overall range of stiffness.

RocketShip^TM tubeset is super stiff. Typically about 25% stiffer than our Benchmark drivetrain. As much as 70% stiffer for our largest frames. This is a specialty tubeset that is not ideal for every rider.
Benchmark tubeset is the sweet spot; it’s balanced and optimized for most riders. For example, all of our world champions have ridden our Benchmark tubesets.
SuppleState^TM tubeset is super smooth and plush. This is a specialty tubeset for specific types of riding.

Specificity

Each tubeset is size-specific and function-specific.

Size-specific: We typically offer 12 frame sizes for each Simple-Custom design. Each of these 12 has a distinct and different tubeset from the other 11 sizes.

Use-specific: We have over 30 Simple-Custom frame designs (gravel, allroads, mountain, bikepacking, etc.). Each of these models has a distinct tubeset we optimize for the use. For example, an allroads benefits from a different tubeset than a gravel bike.

20-Plus Titanium Tube Sizes

We start each design with a choice of more than 20 raw tubes or starter stock. From there, we butt, machine, manipulate, modify, and bend each tube to optimize it for its mission. See Figure 2 for an image of 23 distinct tube profiles.

Full Custom

Concerning drivetrains, in our full custom program, we can make drivetrains over 250% stiffer than our popular Benchmark. While that kind of stiffness is not beneficial to most riders, it provides a good illustration of how extreme our full custom program can get.

Figure 3 shows how stiff the chainstay material can get, 155% stiffer than our Benchmark. Once we add in all the drivetrain elements (dropouts, bottom bracket, etc.), we can nearly double that stiffness.

Figure 1: Overall drivetrain stiffness of Seven’s Simple-Custom tubesets.

Figure 2: An example of 23 distinct starter stock sizes of titanium that Seven uses daily.

Figure 3: Raw stiffness of Seven’s titanium tubing range. Compared to the industry’s most popular 3/4″ titanium chainstays.

Gravel Bikes in 1988

Words: Rob Vandermark, Seveneer

The other day, a few of us were discussing the state of gravel bikes and when we first rode what we’d consider a gravel bike. What is a gravel bike, after all, other than a rig you ride on dirt roads and trails? That could be anything. We used to ride our road bikes on trails all the time and still do once in a while. Even Buster Keaton rode a Penny Farthing on singletrack back in 1926 for the film The General.

So, the term “gravel” doesn’t mean much. The definition Seven starts with is “a drop bar bike with at least 38 mm knobby tires and lower gearing than a road bike.” Everything else is open to interpretation.

The conversation reminded me of my late ’80s project bike, the Singularity; a drop-bar mountain race bike I designed and built at Merlin Metalworks. This is the only image I can find. It’s an old photocopy of a black-and-white photo from Mountain Bike Action magazine.

Today, this design is called a “monster cross” bike.

Zapata Espinoza, editor of Mountain Bike Action, printed a couple of pages about some of the prototypes and project bikes we had at the Merlin factory. Maybe we’ll share more of those at some point. As far as I can decipher, the photo is from the June 1991 issue of MBA.

I had two missions for this bike project:

Build a titanium bike stiffer than a Fat City Wicked. At that time, I loved the ride of steel frames. Merlins were super plush, but back then, as a 20-ish-year-old problem child, I didn’t particularly like the Merlin ride. Gwyn Jones (one of three Merlin founders) gave me his blessing to build a super stiff Merlin.
Build a singularity bike. At least, that’s what I called it. The plan was to have one bike that I’d race road, mountain, and downhill on. That’s a whole other story for another time.

I accomplished both missions with the Singularity. It was way too stiff (particularly because it was the days before front suspension), but I found it race-worthy in the woods and in criteriums. This bike started me on the path of size-specific tubesets and the realization that tubing specification really matters quite a lot.

The bike was a prototype on a number of fronts, not just because of the drop bars. Here are the elements I remember that were unique or firsts back in the late ’80s:

1.5″ down tube and top tube: This made the front end stiffer than the standard Merlins by about 60%. At the time, Merlins had 1.25″ front triangles. Interestingly, the Fat City Wicked of that time had front-end stiffness similar to that of the original Merlins. My Merlin Singularity’s front end was about 40% stiffer than a Wicked.
1.5″ seat tube: This was wild at the time. Steel frames typically had 1.125″ seat tubes, and a few aluminum bikes had “massive” 1.25″ seat tubes. Because I wanted a super-stiff drivetrain, I thought I needed the seat tube to be ridiculously oversized.
A custom-modified front derailleur: The 1.5″ seat tube meant that a standard derailleur clamp wouldn’t fit. Even today, there’s no 1.5″ front derailleur with a 38.1 mm clamp. I machined some parts and rivet-nutted the derailleur directly to the frame. Then, I had to modify the derailleur to get more inboard swing to the cage. It worked well, but I could see the tube warp during shifting under load.
Custom seat post sleeve: The seat tube, being so much larger than a standard diameter, required a special seat tube insert. I machined it from titanium and welded it in a series of overlapping sleeves that looked a bit like Swiss cheese with speed holes everywhere.
Hot swap bar system: I had a quick connect hot swap setup for the bars. I could remove the entire bar and stem assembly as one unit and switch between drops and flat bars. I’m sure someone had done this before, but it was the first time I’d seen it.
5 cm stem: The stem was progressive even by today’s standards. In the photo, and in my memory, it looks like about a 5 cm stem. It was an old quill stem from a Columbia(?) cruiser. Chipped chrome plating and rusting in places. It had a socket head thru-bolt to hold the wedge in place and a socket bolt for the bar, too. I went with this stem because, with the hot swap system, the stem’s short reach worked better with the drop bars hood grip reach compared to the mountain bar grip reach. I had been building titanium stems by this point, but I was in a hurry, so I went with what I had in my parts box.
Shoulder strap pad: In those days, mountain bike courses were a bit different than today. There was almost always some hike-a-bike. I used to love those sections. The shoulder strap made shouldering comfortable and a lot easier to run with. I had the strap rivet-nutted to the frame.
Double wheel system: 26 x 2.25″ mountain bike wheels and 26″ x 26 mm road race wheels.
- I wasn’t aware of anyone doing this back then. While Specialized offered a 26″ x 26 mm road tire, I hadn’t seen anyone use it for a mountain and road bike in one.
- I was able to use 700c Mavic road rims cut down and rerolled to 26″ size. Keith Bontrager was making them at the time. Super light and super narrow. Can’t have everything. I loved them. The rim width had to be identical for both wheels so that the cantilever brakes would work properly. That meant very narrow mountain bike rims.

I designed, machined, and welded this frame.

Mountain bike performance results: I think I raced and trained offroad on the drop bar setup for about a year and a half. Once I had the bike in the drop bar configuration, I rarely swapped it to the mountain bar setup. I loved drops.

Road bike performance results: I raced many a local training criterium on this bike.

The bike’s weak point was the drop bar brakes. The lever arms for drop bars were different from mountain bike levers, so it was difficult to get enough braking power from the cantilever setup. Also, the brake levers themselves were too small for my hands and, therefore, difficult to hang onto during rocky descents. Otherwise, it was a good setup that got me through many rides.

I don’t recall what happened to the Singularity frameset. I was never much of a keeper. Of the hundred-plus prototypes and project bikes I’ve built over the years, I kept only one.

Hat tip to John Tomac, one of my cycling heroes. He used to race drop-bar mountain bikes back in 1990. I think I might have first seen him race that way in 1989, but I can’t remember. The internet says 1990.

Photo caption explained: Zap had this weird thing where he’d add a second last letter to our first names. Don’t ask me why. Zap stayed at Merlin for a few days. When not riding and talking shop, a group of us watched some bad movies, as he mentions in the photo’s caption. I don’t recall what we watched, but I’d wager there was a Godzilla movie on the docket and probably something starring Burt Reynolds. I recall that Zap was not impressed with the humor. I forgave him because he was, and is, an incredible documenter of the times. No one did more for mountain biking in the early days than Zap and Mountain Bike Action. Here’s to Zap for documenting so much over the past 35-plus years in Mountain Bike Action, Road Bike Action, and other media.

+++

Time tracking: Frame build date circa mid-1988. I estimate that date range in part because Zap visited Merlin in the winter of 1989-1990. (I remember riding with him in the freezing cold. Fine riding weather for us Bostonians, but not great for a guy living in LA.) The bike was pretty beat by the time he took this photo. I must have had about a season of riding on it already.

Review: Axiom XX Road Bike

Everyone knows that cyclists love Sevens. But did you know that Cyclist seems to love Seven, too? They just tested our Axiom XX Rider-Ready Performance road bike for their June 2024 print issue.

“It’s a bike that has been built for going far and fast.”

In brief, Cyclist’s words can be summed up with this mashup quote:

“Feel powerful when climbing. Lean confidently into corners and descents. Be powerful on the flats. Float over the rough stuff.”

What more could you want? A super light bike? Why not. The test bike tipped the scales at 7.6 kilos (16.75 lbs) with pedals, full internal routing, and standard SRAM Red parts. That puts this Seven among the lightest full carbon bikes. You get carbon lightness with Seven’s titanium performance, control, handling, and toughness.

Read the complete review here.

Full Aero Internal housing routing. An option on most of our Rider-Ready bikes. Photo credit: Cyclist Magazine

Here’s some of what Cyclist had to say about the ride:

Climbing:

“Climbing is where Seven has built the Axiom XX to excel. And, yes, it is great going uphill.”

“I found the Axiom XX coped happily with even the most beastly slopes.”

“[The Seven has] rigidity to make anyone feel pretty powerful when climbing.”

Descending:

“When rolling downhill, the Axiom XX picked up speed easily, and I found myself leaning confidently into corners, benefiting from the balanced handling and even weight distribution.”

Acceleration:

“[The Seven has] core rigidity to make anyone feel pretty powerful on the flats.”

Handling & Performance:

“The lightweight Axiom XX seemed to float over a lot of the rough stuff and, compared to the carbon bikes I normally ride, the vibration damping was evident.”

“[The Seven has] less inclination to bounce and skitter over road debris compared to its carbon acquaintances.”

“The natural compliance of the titanium tubes made for a more comfortable and assured ride.”

“I found myself leaning confidently into corners, benefiting from the balanced handling and even weight distribution.”

Thanks to our friends and partners at CycleFit for setting this up, supplying the bike, and managing the process.

Even the “low” points chosen by Cyclist Magazine are easily eliminated. Cyclist chose common “objections” about Sevens:

Price: Their setup was $18,000 (£14,300). This was a project bike from Seven’s partners at CycleFit; it was not designed as a price point bike. Our full titanium models start at about 1/3 of the test bike’s price: $6,700 for a complete bike. This is well within the price of any full carbon performance bike.
Long lead time: This is a UK magazine, so the lead times are a bit longer than our US retailers typically see. Our Rider-Ready bikes (which this bike is) are available within three weeks. That’s quite competitive with many high-end carbon bikes.
Less durable when compared to our heavier titanium frames. True on paper. Not so relevant in most riding situations. Regardless, if a rider values toughness over other features, Seven builds bikes for that, too. And it’s even less expensive. More importantly, compared to any full carbon frame, any Seven titanium bike is significantly more durable, so perception of “less durable” is relative.
Less versatile because this is a pure performance road bike. It’s true that pure road bikes are less common this season because “allroads” are in trend. Fortunately, we offer multiple allroads versions of this bike, gravel versions, dual-wheel size versions, etc. Seven’s Rider-Ready bike categories offer more than any stock carbon bike. And if that’s not enough, we offer full custom designs, too.

Who says you can’t have it all? Not Seven.

Read the complete review here.